01Company profile
UK software companyEXAMPLE CASE / 001
- Registered in
- United Kingdom
- Business
- B2B software · own funds
- Owners
- Two · resident in Spain
- Payments
- GBP · EUR
Case assumptions
- Real UK trading office
- No client funds or crypto flows
Which EMIs and banks exclude your company by published policy, which do not, and what to confirm before you pay any provider fees.
Free · Seven questions · No documents

The check starts from your company, not from a provider’s list.
Owner residency may affect eligibility and the checks a provider runs.
GBP and EUR flows raise questions about account types, transfer routes and FX costs.
Before the next one, know which published requirements apply and where your profile stands against them.
A summary of a fictional UK software company’s report. The full version carries the conditions, the costs and the dated sources.
Illustrative case. Legal entities, source links and checks dated Sep 15, 2026 are in the full report.
Registration, activity, owner residency and payment currencies: the facts that decide which providers are worth considering, and what to confirm first.
The order for checking your options, with the reason for each and the conditions still open. Each provider makes its own decision.
Eligibility to confirm, total costs to compare and records to prepare, so the next application is made on purpose.
01Company profile
UK software companyEXAMPLE CASE / 001
Case assumptions
02Account options
UK software companyEXAMPLE CASE / 001
| Provider | Where it stands | What decides it |
|---|---|---|
| Wise Business | Check first | Director checks and UK office evidence |
| 3S Money | Alternative enquiry | Fees and plan for this profile |
| Starling Bank | Excluded | Published rule on owner residency |
03What’s next
UK software companyEXAMPLE CASE / 001
Every finding names its source and the date it was checked. Where sources disagree or a rule is unpublished, the report says so instead of guessing. Most providers are EMIs, electronic money institutions, rather than banks; both publish their requirements, and we check them the same way.
Where the company is incorporated, what it does, where its owners live, its volumes and currencies. No documents and no company name.
Your answers are compared with each provider’s published acceptance policy and fees. Every finding carries its source and the date it was checked.
Who excludes you and why, who does not, and what to confirm with them before you pay any provider fees.
Based on providers’ published policies. No provider pays for placement. Disclosure
See who rules your company out and why, who does not, and what to confirm before paying application fees.
Free
Seven questions · No documents
Providers whose published policy rules out your profile, each named with the policy quote and the date it was read.
Providers that do not exclude you, with every condition still to confirm listed under each. The best match for your answers comes first.
Review, monthly and other fees as each remaining provider publishes them. Where a provider does not publish its fees, the result says so.
Every finding links to its source, with the date it was checked. The full report opens as a web page you can print.
The check reads providers’ published policies. Each provider makes its own decision on your application.
Yes. While the pilot runs, the check and the full result are free: nothing to pay, no card and no documents.
Each EMI or bank makes its own decision after reviewing your application. We identify supported routes and specific blockers; we do not invent approval odds.
No. Banxta compares your answers with providers’ published policies and shows you the result; it does not hold funds or provide accounts. Most of the providers it compares are EMIs (electronic money institutions) rather than banks. Each one decides on your application itself.
The result opens as soon as you answer the last question. It names the providers whose published policy excludes your profile, with the quote and the date it was read; lists the providers that do not, with every condition still to confirm; shows each provider’s published fees, or says that it does not publish them; and starts with the provider whose published policy, currencies and fees best match your answers. The full report opens as a web page you can print.
Then the result says so. Each exclusion is quoted with its date, and a fix-first list shows what each rule turns on, so you can see what would change the answer. If no provider we track serves your country and currencies, the result says that too: it is a gap in our base as much as a statement about your business.
Straight away. The seven questions take about two minutes, and the result opens as soon as you answer the last one. It is built from published policies; nobody reviews your answers by hand.